AG++ / URBAN INTELLIGENCE

Auckland Twin^1.4

Explore the city. Test a better future.

01 / EXPLORE

Building outlines

Recorded geography. Select a footprint to inspect its evidence.

Recorded footprint

Drag to pan · scroll to zoom
Keyboard: arrows, + / −, N

Evidence & methods

LINZ building outlines ↗
CC BY 4.0. Footprint geometry; roof area is a horizontal screening proxy. Heights and occupancy are unknown.

Council / Arup heat assessment ↗
Modelled 2 m air temperature, 300 m model hexagons, November 2021–March 2022. Not a current observation. Source licence: “Creative Commons (refer to data owner)”. Credits: Arup NZ, Lynker Analytics, Stats NZ, Ministry for the Environment, Auckland Council and modified Copernicus Climate Change Service information 2024.

2026 future-climate report ↗

Auckland Council open data ↗
Flood models have varying dates and climate assumptions; inspect each feature. No mapped polygon does not establish absence of flood risk.

Stats NZ 2023 Census ↗
Published aggregate data only. No household or individual attributes are inferred. Census counts are randomly rounded by Stats NZ.

3D extrusion is schematic where verified building heights are absent. This independent AG++ platform does not imply Council endorsement.

TĀMAKI MAKAURAUCity Centre

LINZ · Auckland Council · Stats NZ · © OpenStreetMap contributorsGeographic view / EPSG:4326

03 / DESIGN & COMPARE

What could change?

Show baseline

Additional canopy 0%Share of study window; planting availability is an assumption.Reflective roofs 0%Share of loaded intersecting footprints; roof-area proxy.Solar PV allocation 0%Competing roof uses are scaled to remain within 100%.

Additional canopy area target0 m²

Less roof solar absorption0 kW

Indicative annual PV generation0 MWh / yr

Screening arithmetic, not a calibrated temperature or building-energy forecast. Solar absorption is not electricity saved.

Edit calculation assumptions

Incident sunlight (W/m²)Annual solar irradiation (kWh/m²)PV module efficiency (%)PV performance ratio (%)Original roof albedoReflective roof albedoEligible planting share (%)

These editable values are user assumptions, not measured Auckland property characteristics. Roof slope, shading, obstacles and structural suitability are not assessed.

04 / TAKE THE NEXT STEP

Turn evidence into a decision.

Carry the place, source records, scenario and assumptions into a reproducible brief. An AG++ pilot can provide a verified baseline, three design options and an expert workshop for your site or precinct.

Independent AG++ research prototype · evidence-led screening.

Discuss an AG++ pilot ↗

Read the evidence interpretation